There is a terrifying passage for Christians found in the 25th chapter of the book of Matthew where he recalls the words of his teacher, Jesus. In it Jesus describes a time at the end of the world as we know it where “the King” of all creation judges the people, distinguishing those who go into eternal life and those into eternal death (sheep or goats respectively). The test of destination and identity is by how each person, throughout the course of their life, treated people that Jesus refers to as “the least of these.”
Given the eternal ramifications of these interactions, who then are “the least of these”?
According to the passage the least of these fit into at least 6 categories. They are those who are:
- hungry (v. 35)
- thirsty (v.35)
- stranger (v. 35, greek word xenos – meaning foreigner)
- naked (v.36)
- sick (v.36)
- in prison (v.36)
All 6 of these categories describe people who are in great need.
There are interpreters who qualify that “the least of these” as only referring to needy disciples of Jesus, not needy people in general because in verse 40 Jesus calls them “the least of these MY BROTHERS” (emphasis added). Purporters of this view make this claim because Jesus is talking to his disciples in this passage and earlier in Matthew 12:46-49 Jesus calls his disciples his brothers.
Here’s a number of reasons why I think “the least of these” can be interpreted more broadly than just disciples:
1. In the context of this passage
Jesus speaks of “all nations” and “people” (v.32) being present at the great judgement where this scene is described. The condition of each person’s separation, one from the other, is how they treat “the least of these.” If the least of these were only disciples of Jesus in need there are at least a couple issues. What would happen to those who do not live amongst or come in contact with disciples of Jesus (the modern mission movement exists because there are still populations of people for which this is true), let alone a disciple in need? Wouldn’t it be likely that those that are not in contact with disciples of Jesus would be those who are in more need?
2. In the context of this gospel
If we are going to use Matthew 12 we must also look at the other uses of the word “brothers” (adelphos) in the book of Matthew. When speaking to “the crowds and to his disciples” in Matthew 23:1, Jesus broadens the definition here that they should reckon each other all as “brothers” in 23:8 (disciples and non-disciples alike). In the “sermon on the mount” no less, recorded earlier in the same book, Jesus teaches that an identifying mark of being “sons of [our] Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 5:45) are those that EXPAND the circle of whom we love and that to greet only our “brothers” in the limited sense would make us no different than unbelievers (Matthew 5:46-47). It seems strange, and a little suspect, to turn around and insist then that our definition of care for our “brothers” in Matthew 25 then ought not expand to include others in need…which Jesus is constantly challenging his disciples to do (Matthew 4:24, 5:3, 8:16, 9:12, 11:5, 14:14, 15:32, 19:21). So it seems we may not truly be the “brothers” that we think we are if our love is so limited.
3. In the context of the rest of scripture
There are too many passages to name here that affirm God’s identification and concern for the poor, the needy, and the stranger that the weight against a contrary interpretation is revealing (just for starters: Exodus 23:6, Deuteronomy 10:18, Leviticus 23:22, Psalm 140:12, Proverbs 14:31, Isaiah 1:17, Jeremiah 22:16, Acts 10:2-4, Galatians 2:10).
4. Even if the interpretation is correct that the least of these is limited to the disciples of Jesus, the irony is that the vast majority of the disciples in the world are more likely the poor, the needy, and the stranger anyway. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2016/may/26/the-world-is-getting-more-religious-because-the-poor-go-for-god
Like the lawyer, seeking to justify himself before Jesus in Luke Ch.10, I wonder if we as interpreters of the bible want to make the circle of “the least of these” smaller because we hope to limit our responsibility…we want a more comfortable religion? But isn’t what we see in Jesus the opposite? He’s constantly flipping our expectations (responding to the lawyer’s question with the story of the good Samaritan) and breaking through our carefully crafted barriers.
Jesus, help us to love the least of these…to love you.